Folk deceptions

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Deceptions in Quasicrystal Growth

We discuss a new general phenomenon pertaining to tiling models of quasicrystal growth. It is known that with Penrose tiles no (de-terministic) local matching rules exist which guarantee defect-free tiling for regions of arbitrary large size. We prove that this property holds quite generally: namely, that the emergence of defects in quasicrystal growth is unavoidable for all aperiodic tiling mo...

متن کامل

Medicine, lies and deceptions.

This article offers a qualified defence of the view that there is a moral difference between telling lies to one's patients, and deceiving them without lying. However, I take issue with certain arguments offered by Jennifer Jackson in support of the same conclusion. In particular, I challenge her claim that to deny that there is such a moral difference makes sense only within a utilitarian fram...

متن کامل

Victories and deceptions in tumor immunology

The last year closed with negative news for tumor immunology. Stimuvax, an investigational therapeutic anticancer vaccine that Merck licensed from the US biotech firm Oncothyreon, failed to increase overall survival in a Phase III clinical trial designed to evaluate its efficacy in a cohort of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients. Stimuvax, also known as L-BLP25 or BLP25, is a liposom...

متن کامل

‘Folk psychology’ is not folk psychology

This paper disputes the claim that our understanding of others is enabled by a commonsense or ‘folk’ psychology, whose ‘core’ involves the attribution of intentional states in order to predict and explain behaviour. I argue that interpersonal understanding is seldom, if ever, a matter of two people assigning intentional states to each other but emerges out of a context of interaction between th...

متن کامل

Eliminating deceptions and mistaken belief to infer conversational implicature

Conversational implicatures are usually described as being licensed by the disobeying or flouting of some principle by the speaker in cooperative dialogue. However, such work has failed to distinguish cases of the speaker flouting such a principle from cases where the speaker is either deceptive or holds a mistaken belief. In this paper, we demonstrate how the three different cases can be disti...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Nature

سال: 1989

ISSN: 0028-0836,1476-4687

DOI: 10.1038/337202e0